Comparaison de l'occupation rwandaise de l'Est de la RDC à l'occupation nazie de l'Europe
Introduction
Les comparaisons historiques sont souvent dérangeantes, mais elles demeurent indispensables pour comprendre la répétition de certains schémas de domination, de violence et d'impunité. Comparer l'implication militaire du Rwanda et l'occupation de facto de certaines parties de l'Est de la République démocratique du Congo à l'occupation nazie de l'Europe durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale ne vise ni à confondre les idéologies ni à banaliser l'Holocauste. Il s'agit d'une comparaison analytique, fondée sur les structures de l'occupation, les méthodes de contrôle, l'exploitation économique, la manipulation des récits et l'échec de la communauté internationale à faire respecter le droit international et à protéger les civils.
Pour les populations congolaises du Nord et du Sud-Kivu, l'occupation n'est pas une notion juridique abstraite. Elle constitue une expérience vécue au quotidien, marquée par la peur, les déplacements forcés, la perte des moyens de subsistance et l'effondrement de l'autorité de l'État. Le recours à des parallèles historiques permet de rendre visible ce que le langage diplomatique tend à dissimuler.
Lire plus :
https://weimproveafrica.blogspot.com/2026/01/comparaison-de-loccupation-rwandaise-de.html
Comparing Rwanda's Occupation of Eastern DRC with the Nazi Occupation of Europe
Introduction
Historical comparisons are often uncomfortable, yet they are essential for understanding how patterns of domination, violence, and impunity repeat themselves across time. Comparing Rwanda's military involvement and de facto occupation of parts of eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo with the Nazi occupation of Europe during the Second World War is not an attempt to equate historical ideologies or minimise the Holocaust. Rather, it is an analytical comparison focused on structures of occupation, methods of control, economic exploitation, narrative manipulation, and the failures of the international community to uphold international law and protect civilians.
For Congolese communities living in North and South Kivu, occupation is not an abstract legal term. It is a daily lived experience defined by fear, displacement, loss of livelihoods, and the erosion of state authority. Examining this reality through historical parallels helps expose what is often obscured by diplomatic language and security narratives.
Find more
https://weimproveafrica.blogspot.com/2026/01/comparing-rwandas-occupation-of-eastern.html
While the State of Israel was established in the Middle East in 1948, Zionism's founder, Theodor Herzl, once considered an African territory (part of modern-day Kenya) as a potential Jewish homeland due to rampant antisemitism in Europe, a proposal known as the "Uganda Scheme," though it was ultimately rejected in favor of a return to Palestine. Later, Israel developed complex relationships with African nations, including political and military ties with Apartheid South Africa, despite public condemnation of its policies, complicating broader African-Israeli relations.
The "Uganda Scheme" of 1903:
Israel's Establishment (1948)
Oya sha, sigaho! Muri Repubulika ( 1962-1994) amashuli yisumbuye cyane cyane ayaza Sections Scientifiques yigishaga kandi igaha ur...
