--On Wed., 7 Sep. 2022 at 8:37, chris walters<cwalters28739@hotmail.com> wrote:
Regional leaders kept controversial former Burundian Prime Minister Alain Guillaume Bunyoni on their radar as he planned a coup, officials said on Thursday morning.
"Bunyoni accumulated a lot of wealth and had built a strong network of supporters in the internal security apparatus of Burundi," said a highly placed official.
"Bunyoni tried several times to build alliances with many military officials in Burundi and the region to create conditions for a coup against President Ndayishimiye. But Ndayishimiye briefed East African regional leaders who kept Bunyoni's actions under radar," the source added.
Bunyoni was on Wednesday morning removed from the position of Prime Minister, a move that was endorsed by Parliament.
Ndayishimiye had earlier warned government leaders planning a coup against him that they would "fail miserably."
Bunyoni, who previously served as Police chief and Minister of Internal Security, was replaced with General Gervais Ndirakobucuba – the Internal Affairs Minister.
Sources told this investigative website that regional leaders quietly expressed their support to Ndayishimiye against Bunyoni's moves.
"We could not risk another conflict in the region," said a well placed source who preferred anonymity to speak freely.
The unfolding developments in Burundi evoke memories of the 2015 botched coup plot in Bujumbura.
Army generals attempted to overthrow President Pierre Nkurunziza as he attended a regional meeting in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
However, Tanzania and Uganda opposed the coup attempt and helped Nkuruziza return to power.
Then Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete provided a special force that escorted Nkurunziza from Dar es Salaam back home.
The coup plot sparked a deadly gun battle in the capital Bujumbura and later a bloody internal conflict in which hundreds died.
The turmoil left at least 1,200 dead and saw 400,000 flee the country.
Burundi recently deployed over 600 elite forces to counter the Red Tabara movement in South Kivu, DRC.
The Red Tabara rebels are backed by Burundian dissident generals who fled Bujumbura in 2015 after a failed coup attempt against President Nkurunziza.
Profile
Ndayishimiye's choice of Ndirakobucuba underscores his determination to defeat any internal insurrection.
Ndirakobucuba is a former rebel commander and police commissioner. He served alongside Nkurunziza and Ndayishimiye in the war that ended in 2003.
Prior to that, he was the Minister of Interior, Public Security, and Community Development. In 2015, Ndirakobucuba worked closely with Ndayishimiye and then intelligence chief, Gen Adolphe Nshimirimana to counter the dissident generals who tried to seize power from Nkurunziza. The western countries accused Ndirakobucuba of human rights violations before slapping sanctions on him.
Ndayishimiye appointed him to a powerful position of Minister of Interior in 2020, making Ndirakobuca the most internationally sanctioned member of Burundi national government cabinet.
He was seen as a de facto deputy prime minister or 'supper minister' with his overwhelming portfolio across three key ministries of Interior, Security, and Community Development in the Nkurunziza's government, but was merged into a single ministry by Ndayishimiye and given to Ndirakobuca.
La justice française continue de solder les dossiers sensibles liés au génocide au Rwanda : un non-lieu général a été ordonné dans l'enquête sur l'inaction reprochée à l'armée française lors des massacres de Bisesero fin juin 1994.
Dix-sept ans après l'ouverture de cette information judiciaire, et quatre ans après sa clôture, deux juges d'instruction du tribunal judiciaire de Paris ont signé le 1er septembre une ordonnance de non-lieu, a appris l'AFP mercredi de sources proches du dossier.
Dans cette affaire, les associations Survie, Ibuka, FIDH et six rescapés de Bisesero, parties civiles, accusaient la mission militaro-humanitaire française Turquoise et la France de "complicité de génocide" pour avoir, selon eux, sciemment abandonné pendant trois jours les civils tutsi réfugiés dans les collines de Bisesero, dans l'Ouest du pays, laissant se perpétrer le massacre de centaines d'entre eux par les génocidaires, du 27 au 30 juin 1994.
Mais les magistrats instructeurs ont estimé que l'instruction n'avait pas établi "la participation directe des forces militaires françaises à des exactions commises dans des camps de réfugiés, ni aucune complicité par aide ou assistance aux forces génocidaires ou complicité par abstention des militaires français sur les collines de Bisesero", a précisé dans un communiqué la procureure de Paris Laure Beccuau.
- Décision prévisible -
Cette décision était prévisible puisqu'aucun des cinq officiers généraux impliqués n'avaient été mis en examen au terme de l'enquête conclue en juillet 2018, une étape nécessaire avant d'envisager un éventuel procès.
Le parquet avait de fait requis en mai 2021 un non-lieu dans ce dossier sensible, emblématique de la controverse historique sur les objectifs de la mission Turquoise, déployée au Rwanda sous mandat de l'ONU pour faire cesser le génocide des Tutsi.
Selon l'ONU, les massacres ont fait plus de 800.000 morts entre avril et juillet 1994, essentiellement au sein de la minorité tutsi.
"Ce non-lieu est parfaitement logique, il était attendu depuis de nombreuses années", a réagi auprès de l'AFP Me Pierre-Olivier Lambert, avocat de trois des officiers généraux, dont le chef de Turquoise, le général Jean-Claude Lafourcade.
"L'enquête minutieuse a mis en évidence que les responsables militaires de l'opération Turquoise avaient réalisé leur mission avec humanité, courage et impartialité", a affirmé Me Lambert, estimant qu'"il était temps que la justice française reconnaisse enfin le caractère irréprochable de la mission" menée par les militaires français au Rwanda en 1994.
Pour Me Emmanuel Bidanda, avocat du colonel Jacques Rosier, chef des opérations spéciales présent à Bisesero, c'est "une grande satisfaction".
"Au terme d'une instruction en cours depuis 17 ans avec X juges d'instruction qui se sont succédé, nos clients sont hors de cause et l'armée française n'est pas complice ni de génocide ni de crimes contre l'humanité", a-t-il salué.
- Rapport Duclert -
Début juin, un des magistrats instructeurs chargés du dossier avait ordonné le versement au dossier d'une synthèse de ce rapport publié en mars 2021, qui pointait notamment "l'échec profond" de la France lors des massacres de Bisesero.
Pour les parties civiles, qui réclamaient un procès non seulement contre les militaires mais également contre des membres de l'entourage de l'ancien président François Mitterrand, jamais visés par l'enquête, cela signifiait qu'il souhaitait relancer l'instruction.
Pour Me Eric Plouvier, avocat de l'association Survie, "ce non-lieu est consternant (...) c'est un mépris judiciaire pour la manifestation de la vérité."
"Du point de vue procédural, le juge ayant +rouvert+ l'instruction et joint de nouvelles pièces, aurait dû procéder aux formalités prévues par la loi. Sur le fond, aucune conséquence pénale n'a été tirée des pistes ouvertes par le rapport Duclert et des éléments réunis en procédure", a-t-il ajouté, annonçant son intention de faire appel.
Me Patrick Baudouin, qui défend la FIDH avec Me Clémence Bectarte, s'est dit "extrêmement déçu de cette décision de non-lieu au bout de tant d'années d'instruction et d'éléments rassemblés", trouvant "dommageable que l'information (judiciaire) n'ait pu se poursuivre alors que des demandes avaient été formulées au vu du rapport Duclert".
Mais "à l'issue de l'analyse de ce document, les magistrats instructeurs ont estimé qu'une reprise de l'information judiciaire ne se justifiait pas, car +les documents cités en référence par les auteurs du rapport à l'appui de leurs constats, dans leur immense majorité, figuraient déjà en procédure ou se trouvaient, dans les pièces de l'information judiciaire, des équivalents ou une résonance+", a expliqué Mme Beccuau dans son communiqué.
WASHINGTON — It is the element of President Biden's foreign policy that overlaps most significantly with his domestic agenda: defending democracy.
His drive to buttress democracy at home and abroad has taken on more urgency as Russia wages war in Ukraine, China expands its power and former President Donald J. Trump and his Republican supporters attack American democratic norms and fair elections.
In a speech in Philadelphia last week, Mr. Biden warned about the threat to democracy in the United States and said American citizens were in "a battle for the soul of this nation."
Even as he hammers home that message ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, Mr. Biden's efforts to bolster democracy abroad are about to come into sharper focus. The White House is expected to announce a second multinational Summit for Democracy. And the National Security Strategy, which could be released this month, will highlight reinforcement of democracies as a policy priority, officials say.
On his most recent overseas trip, Antony J. Blinken, the secretary of state, announced in the Democratic Republic of Congo that the United States would help the country with "preparations for next year's free, fair and on-time elections" — an emphasis on the sanctity of elections that echoes Mr. Biden's defense of the 2020 U.S. presidential election against Mr. Trump's persistent attempts to undermine its results.
Stories like this are possible because of our deep commitment to original reporting, produced by a global staff of over 1,700 journalists who have all dedicated themselves to helping you understand the world. That work is only possible because of the support of our subscribers. I hope you'll consider becoming one today.
Marc Lacey, Managing Editor
Pursuing parallel policies to strengthen democracy at home and abroad allows the Biden administration to focus on a single central message, while the president's political aides shape the identity of the Democratic Party around it.
And it gives Mr. Biden the standing to claim he is the torchbearer of an American foreign policy tradition that contrasts sharply with Mr. Trump's isolationist "America First" approach and praise for autocrats. That tradition, liberal internationalism, revolves around the idea that global stability comes from democratic systems, free markets and participation in American-led multinational organizations.
"I think the rhetorical — and I would say sincerely moral — emphasis is welcome, as is the effort to draw democracies together," said Larry Diamond, a scholar of democracy at Stanford University.
But in recent years, liberal internationalism has come under criticism from politicians, policymakers and scholars well beyond the Trump camp, and Mr. Biden risks being seen as naïve or imperialistic in centering his foreign policy on strengthening democracies.
Critics point to the disastrous wars and nation-building efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan that were carried out in the name of democracy. And they say the decades-long American push for free trade and open markets has fueled global inequality, environmental catastrophe and the empowerment of authoritarian figures and groups like the Chinese Communist Party, which now presents an anti-democratic but materially successful governance model to the world.
Officials in the Biden administration say they are approaching the defense of democracy with a sense of humility and are open to learning from other nations.
On his travels last month, Mr. Blinken unveiled a new U.S. strategy for Africa that has democracy support at its core. But he also said at a news conference in Kinshasa, Congo's capital, that the United States did not "want a one-sided, transactional relationship."
He praised Congo for being a "strong participant" in the Summit for Democracy that Mr. Biden convened in Washington last year.
Congo is a nascent democracy. After a troubled presidential election in 2019, it had its first peaceful transfer of power. Mr. Blinken promised the country an additional $10 million "to promote peaceful political participation and transparency" in elections next year, for a total of $24 million in such programs overseen by the United States Agency for International Development.
Mr. Biden's aides say their approach emphasizes "democratic resilience" rather than "democracy promotion," unlike efforts by earlier administrations. They argue they are strengthening democratic nations and cooperation among them rather than pushing for changes of political systems or governments.
The framing is defensive rather than offensive, with a recognition that democracies are under threat, often from internal forces, in ways they have not been in decades.
And the officials also say global challenges like climate change, the pandemic and economic recovery are best addressed by democracies working in concert.
Furthermore, they argue, no other recent administration has had to rally partners and allies urgently to confront the challenges posed by both China and Russia, which in different ways are undermining what U.S. officials call the "rules-based international order." Administration officials say there is a competition between democracies and autocracies to demonstrate which can deliver for their people and the world.
But in tackling those broad issues, the Biden administration will have to determine on a case-by-case basis whether to work with authoritarian nations or prioritize the principles in its "democracy versus autocracy" line.
"It makes it more difficult when you're framing it this narrowly to reach out to those states you might need," said Emma Ashford, a senior fellow on foreign policy at the Stimson Center. "It might leave out space for more global issues — the things you might need to talk to autocracies about."
In the Middle East, Mr. Biden has visibly calibrated his position on autocracies, meeting in July with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia despite vowing earlier to make that nation a "pariah" for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, a columnist for The Washington Post, by Saudi operatives. Mr. Biden's aides said the president was focused on working with Saudi Arabia on diplomacy with Israel, global energy security, competition with China and ending the Yemen war.
And the officials say the United States still needs to find ways to cooperate with Russia and China on certain issues: the nuclear programs of Iran and North Korea, climate change and the pandemic, for starters.
To oppose Russia's war in Ukraine, the Biden administration has had to work closely with Hungary and Turkey, countries that, though members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, have become synonymous with the erosion of democracy.
Viktor Orban, the prime minister of Hungary, presents a complicated challenge. As he dismantles his country's democratic norms and promotes nationalism based on ethnic and religious identity, he has emerged as a role model for many American conservatives. Last month, he got a hero's welcome when he spoke at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Dallas.
And prominent American conservative political figures, including Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump's former adviser, have said they want to create alliances between right-wing populist groups in Europe — which often embrace anti-democratic values — and ones in the United States.
This growing intersection of politics abroad and in the United States brings into sharp relief what a senior Biden official calls the "interconnected" foreign and domestic policy efforts in the administration to strengthen democracy.
But Mr. Diamond said there is a shortfall in the material resources the administration has devoted to bolstering democracy abroad. For one thing, he said, the United States must ensure it and its democratic partners are perceived as militarily stronger than their autocratic rivals. That means not only repelling the Russian invasion of Ukraine, he said, but also accelerating weapons deliveries to Taiwan so the island can deter a potential invasion by China.
He added that the Biden administration also needed to increase its public diplomacy efforts to turn international opinion against Russia and China, pointing to the difficulties that U.S. officials have had in getting member states of the United Nations to approve resolutions condemning Russia for the war in Ukraine.
"Russia and China, with their vast propaganda apparatuses, have made very significant inroads, particularly in terms of elite opinion and dialogue," Mr. Diamond said.
Mr. Biden has requested hundreds of millions of dollars from Congress for pro-democracy initiatives, including two programs aimed at supporting anti-corruption efforts, independent journalism, elections and pro-democracy activists.
Officials around the world will be watching to see exactly how the United States carries out those programs — and whether Washington can now avoid the pitfalls that Western powers have had in trying to spread ideas and practices abroad.
At a news conference with Mr. Blinken in Pretoria, the foreign minister of South Africa, Naledi Pandor, said the United States should work with African nations as equals and use tools already developed by Africans.
"To come in and seek to teach a country that we know how democracy functions and we've come to tell you, 'You do it. It'll work for you' — I think it leads to defeat," she said. "So we need to think in different ways."
Some analysts note that several African nations with strongman rulers were excluded from Mr. Biden's democracy summit in December, including Rwanda and Uganda, to the potential detriment of U.S. policy on the continent.
"That selectivity already puts leaders and countries in a state of criticism to the U.S.," said Bob Wekesa, a scholar at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. "They are on a collision path already."
Lynsey Chutel contributed reporting from Johannesburg.
Muri Bus ya compagnie yitwa TRINITY yari ivuye i Kigali igiye I Nairobi umunyarwanda yafatanywe ibihanga bitatu by'abantu ku mupaka wa K...
